Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Franklin v. USX Corp.

California Court of Appeal
105 Cal. Rptr. 2d (2001)


Facts

Jeannette Franklin and her husband Darrel Franklin (plaintiffs) filed an action against USX Corporation (USX) (defendant) based on personal injury, premises liability, and loss of consortium. The Franklins alleged that Mrs. Franklin, now deceased, had contracted an asbestos-caused cancer due to childhood exposure to asbestos brought home by her parents, who had worked at the Western Pipe & Steel Shipyard (WPS) during World War II. In 1945, the assets of WPS were purchased by Consolidated Steel Corporation of California (Con Cal), and Con Cal agreed to assume all of WPS’s liabilities. Several years later, Con Cal sold the transferred assets for over $17,000,000 to Consolidated Western Steel Corporation of Delaware (Con Del), which later merged with U.S. Steel and changed its name to USX. The Franklins alleged that USX was the successor in interest to WPS, and sought to hold USX liable. The trial court found that USX was the successor in interest to WPS and liable for any damages caused by WPS. A jury later returned a verdict for damages in excess of $5,000,000 against USX. USX appealed the trial court’s decision that USX was the successor in interest to WPS.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.