Frazier v. Cupp
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 731 (1969)
- Written by Ariella Zarfati, JD
Facts
Frazier (defendant) was taken into custody on suspicion of involvement in a fight. Police recorded interrogations conducted while Frazier was in custody. Frazier was initially questioned briefly and then given a summary overview of his constitutional rights. Frazier was informed of his right to legal counsel and warned that his statements could be used against him at trial. During subsequent questioning, police falsely informed Frazier that a co-defendant had confessed. Frazier volunteered incriminating information. Frazier then indicated a desire to be represented by an attorney. The interrogation continued and Frazier ultimately executed a written confession. Frazier appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court arguing that his confession was illegally obtained and improperly admitted as evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
