Frederick Warne & Co. v. Book Sales, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
481 F. Supp. 1191 (1979)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Since 1902, Frederick Warne & Company (Warne) (plaintiff) had published books trademarked the “Original Peter Rabbit Books.” Some of the books in the Peter Rabbit series were not protected by copyright and thus in the public domain. However, Warne claimed that it had trademark protection under the Lanham Act for certain illustrations in the books. Since 1977, Book Sales, Inc. (BSI) (defendant) had published copies of those Peter Rabbit books that were in the public domain, including the illustrations for which Warne claimed protection. Warne sued BSI for trademark infringement. BSI argued that because the illustrations were part of the copyrightable works in the public domain, they were not protectable under trademark law. Both parties moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sofaer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.