Freedman v. America Online, Inc.

303 F. Supp. 2d 121 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Freedman v. America Online, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
303 F. Supp. 2d 121 (2004)

Facts

William Young and David Bensey (the officers) (defendants) were police officers performing an investigation. The officers filled out a search warrant application seeking information from America Online, Inc. (AOL) (defendant) regarding Clifton Freedman (plaintiff). The application, however, was never submitted to a judge for completion and never bore a judicial signature. Nonetheless, several days later, AOL responded to the officers’ request with Freedman’s subscriber information, such as his name, address, and phone number. In response, Freedman sued the officers for (among other things) violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA). Freedman claimed that the officers violated the ECPA by seeking his information from AOL without a valid search warrant. Eventually, Freedman moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether the officers violated the ECPA. The officers opposed the motion, arguing (among other things) that (1) they merely requested, but did not require, that AOL produce the information and (2) there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether AOL produced the information under an emergency exception in the ECPA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dorsey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership