From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Frost v. Porter Leasing Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
436 N.E.2d 387 (1982)
Frost (plaintiff) was injured in an automobile accident, and sued the other driver for medical costs, pain and suffering, impaired earning capacity, and future expenses. Under his union health insurance plan, Frost received medical benefits from his insurer, Union Labor. Union Labor intervened in the case, claiming a right of subrogation to share in any recovery Frost might receive for medical expenses. Frost settled the claim, and the trial court found that Union Labor had a right of subrogation in the settlement for the amount it had paid to Frost, reduced by a proportion of Frost’s cost in obtaining the settlement. The Superior Court certified the subrogation question directly to this court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hennessey, C.J.)
Concurrence (Wilkins, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.