Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
United States Supreme Court
606 U.S. 1 (2025)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Miriam Fuld and other United States citizens (victims) (plaintiffs) were injured in terrorist attacks outside of the United States. The victims sued the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) (defendant) in federal district court. The Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) provided that the PLO and the Palestinian Authority (PA) consented to personal jurisdiction by paying salaries to terrorists in Israeli prisons and by continuing to maintain facilities in the United States. The PLO moved to dismiss the suits for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court granted the motion, and the Second Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 955,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New




