G.C. Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.

662 N.W.2d 710 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

G.C. Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.

Michigan Supreme Court
662 N.W.2d 710 (2003)

SC

Facts

G.C. Timmis & Company (Timmis) (plaintiff) was not a licensed real estate broker. Timmis contracted with Guardian Alarm Company (Guardian) (defendant) to find companies that Guardian could purchase. The agreement provided a fee for Timmis whenever it found a company that Guardian ultimately purchased. Timmis found a company, MetroCell, for Guardian to purchase, and Guardian purchased the company. Guardian, however, declined to pay Timmis the fee because Timmis was not a licensed real estate broker. Michigan’s Occupational Code (the code) regulated several different professions. Each article within the code regulated a separate, single profession. Within the code, the real estate brokers act (REBA) defined “real estate broker” as an individual who (1) buys or sells real estate market analysis, (2) negotiates for the purchase, sale, or mortgage of real estate, (3) leases real estate as a vocation, (4) manages property as a vocation, (5) “sells or offers for sale, buys or offers to buy, leases or offers to lease or negotiates the purchase . . . of a business, business opportunity, or the goodwill of an existing business for others,” or (6) engages in the sale of real estate as a principal vocation. Timmis sued Guardian, seeking to recover the fee under the contract. The court denied Guardian’s motion for summary disposition, and Guardian appealed. The court of appeals reversed, holding that REBA covered the brokerage of more than simply real estate and that Timmis was acting as a real estate broker without a license and thus was not entitled to payment. Timmis appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Markman, J.)

Dissent (Young, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership