From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Gamerco SA v. ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Limited
High Court, Queen’s Bench Division
 E.M.L.R. 263 (1995)
ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Limited (defendant) organized a European tour for the music group Guns ‘n’ Roses (defendant). The tour was for 53 days. The tour required hiring over 100 support personnel. The tour also required chartering a Boeing 727, 12 large trucks, and five sleeper coaches for the entire 53 days. ICM and the music group contracted with Gamerco SA (plaintiff) to promote the group’s appearances in Spain, including a July 4 concert in Madrid. Under the contract, Gamerco would erect the stage and prepare the venue for the concert, and Guns ‘n’ Roses would appear and perform for 90 minutes. The contract guaranteed ICM and Guns ‘n’ Roses either $1.1 million or 90 percent of the net door receipts for the Madrid concert, whichever was greater. Gamerco paid an advance of $412,500 towards this ultimate payment. However, on June 30, engineers discovered problems with the chosen venue. On July 1, the permit to use the venue for the concert was revoked. Despite efforts to locate an alternative venue, nothing suitable was available, and the concert was canceled on July 2. Gamerco sued to recover the advance payment of $412,500, arguing that the contract had been discharged by frustration. Both defendants argued that this amount should be reduced by the expenses that they had incurred to fulfill their part of the contract. In support of this claim, the defendants submitted evidence of their total tour expenses, and then allocated two of the 53 tour days as expenses for the Madrid concert. The defendants also submitted other expenses, like hotel room costs for July 3 and 4.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Garland, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.