Gault v. Sideman
Illinois Appellate Court
191 N.E.2d 436 (1963)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Theodore Gault (plaintiff) suffered from a spinal condition. Doctors Sideman, Glassman, and Wolin (the doctors) (defendants) advised Gault that his condition could be cured by an operation on the spine, and Gault consented to the operation, which was unsuccessful. Gault sued the doctors for breaching a contract to cure him. The trial court directed a verdict for the doctors, and the circuit court affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCormick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.