Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
United States Supreme Court
529 U.S. 861 (2000)
Alexis Geier (plaintiff) was involved in an accident while driving a 1987 Honda Accord and was seriously injured. Geier sued America Honda Motor Co., Inc. and its affiliates (Honda) (defendants), alleging that defendants had negligently designed the 1987 Honda Accord by failing to include a driver’s side airbag. The court of appeals found that Geier’s negligence lawsuit was preempted by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Act), which provided for the promulgation of motor vehicle safety standards. Honda was in compliance with the standard for passive restraints in motor vehicles: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, FMVSS 208. Geier appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.