General Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
409 F.2d 246 (1969)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
General Builders Supply Company, Inc. (GBS) (plaintiff), and GBS’s subcontractor, Hupp Corporation (Hupp), entered into a fixed-price contract with the General Services Administration (government) (defendant) to supply approximately 7,900 refrigerators for use in Germany. Pursuant to the contract, Hupp built pre-production refrigerator models for the government’s inspection. The government rejected Hupp’s pre-production models three times and then terminated GBS’s contract for default, stating that GBS failed to fulfill contract specifications. GBS filed a petition with the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (Board), arguing that (1) the government had improperly terminated GBS’s contract; and (2) GBS was entitled to recover costs and entitled to an equitable adjustment for the anticipated profits that GBS and Hupp would have earned from the contract. The government rejected GBS’s claim for anticipated profits but agreed GBS was entitled to recover costs. The Board held that (a) because GBS’s contract had been improperly terminated for default, GBS was entitled to recover as if GBS’s contract had been terminated for the government’s convenience; and (b) GBS’s equitable adjustment could not include anticipated profits because the default clause in GBS’s contract did not allow recovery of anticipated profits. GBS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.