From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
George v. Ransom
Supreme Court of California
76 Am.Dec. 490 (1860)
Facts
George (plaintiff) was a creditor of the husband of E. S. Ransom (defendant). George sought a court order to obtain dividends from Ransom’s stocks. Ransom had bought the stocks with money that was considered her separate property. The trial court denied the order and dismissed the proceedings, holding that the dividends were considered Ransom’s separate property. George appealed to the Supreme Court of California.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baldwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
