Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Supreme Court of Ohio
662 N.E.2d 287 (1996)
Gladon (plaintiff) was inside a train station owned by RTA (defendant). Gladon was inebriated and got into a fight with two other men. Gladon either fell or was pushed onto the train tracks. An RTA train approached Gladon, traveling at twenty miles-per-hour with its lights on. The driver saw Gladon and braked hard, eventually activating the emergency brake. The train collided with Gladon causing him serious injuries. Gladon brought a negligence claim against RTA, and the trial court denied RTA’s motion for directed verdict. After determining that Gladon was an invitee, the court charged the jury to find RTA negligent if the driver had failed to exercise ordinary care in discovering Gladon on the tracks or failed to exercise ordinary care to avoid injuring Gladon. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Gladon.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cook, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.