Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc.

811 F.3d 528 (2016)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
G
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
811 F.3d 528 (2016)

Play video

Facts

Eric Glatt, Alexander Footman, and Eden Antalik (plaintiffs) were hired as unpaid interns for Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. and Fox Entertainment Group (Fox) (defendants). Glatt and Footman interned in various departments associated with the Fox Searchlight-distributed film Black Swan, and Antalik interned at Fox Searchlight’s corporate office. In 2011, Glatt, Footman, and Antalik sued Fox in federal district court, asserting that Fox violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law by not paying them as employees during their internships as required by the statutes’ minimum-wage and overtime provisions. Glatt and Footman moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of their employment status, asserting that Fox had improperly classified them as unpaid interns instead of as employees. The district court granted the motion, and Fox appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Employment Law
Labor Law

Key Terms