Godoy v. Abamaster of Miami, Inc.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
754 N.Y.S.2d 301 (2003)

- Written by Emily Laird, JD
Facts
Zoila Godoy (plaintiff) lost four fingers when using a manually fed meat grinder. Godoy brought a strict products-liability action against Mike’s Restaurant Equipment Corp. (the retailer), Abamaster of Miami, Inc., and Abamaster, Inc. (the wholesale distributor), and Carfel, Inc. (the importer) (defendants). There was no jurisdiction over the grinder’s Taiwanese manufacturer. The importer had offices in the United States and Taiwan. The importer purchased the grinder from the manufacturer, imported the grinder into the United States, and then sold the grinder to the wholesale distributor without ever having removed the grinder from its carton. The wholesale distributor received the grinder’s sealed carton from the importer and then sold the still-sealed box to the retailer. The retailer then sold the grinder in its store. The trial court entered a default judgment against the retailer. Godoy pursued claims against the grinder’s wholesale distributor and importer. The wholesale distributor filed a crossclaim against the importer for contribution and indemnification. The importer also filed a crossclaim against the wholesale distributor for contribution. At trial, a jury found the grinder was defectively designed and found Godoy 40 percent liable, the wholesale distributor 50 percent liable, and the importer 10 percent liable. After the jury’s verdict, the grinder’s wholesale distributor sought indemnification against the importer. The trial court ruled that the wholesale distributor was not entitled to indemnification from the importer because the jury found both the wholesale distributor and importer liable as joint tortfeasors. The wholesale distributor appealed the lower court’s dismissal of its indemnification claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Townes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.