Godoy v. Abamaster of Miami, Inc.

754 N.Y.S.2d 301 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Godoy v. Abamaster of Miami, Inc.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
754 N.Y.S.2d 301 (2003)

EL

Facts

Zoila Godoy (plaintiff) lost four fingers when using a manually fed meat grinder. Godoy brought a strict products-liability action against Mike’s Restaurant Equipment Corp. (the retailer), Abamaster of Miami, Inc., and Abamaster, Inc. (the wholesale distributor), and Carfel, Inc. (the importer) (defendants). There was no jurisdiction over the grinder’s Taiwanese manufacturer. The importer had offices in the United States and Taiwan. The importer purchased the grinder from the manufacturer, imported the grinder into the United States, and then sold the grinder to the wholesale distributor without ever having removed the grinder from its carton. The wholesale distributor received the grinder’s sealed carton from the importer and then sold the still-sealed box to the retailer. The retailer then sold the grinder in its store. The trial court entered a default judgment against the retailer. Godoy pursued claims against the grinder’s wholesale distributor and importer. The wholesale distributor filed a crossclaim against the importer for contribution and indemnification. The importer also filed a crossclaim against the wholesale distributor for contribution. At trial, a jury found the grinder was defectively designed and found Godoy 40 percent liable, the wholesale distributor 50 percent liable, and the importer 10 percent liable. After the jury’s verdict, the grinder’s wholesale distributor sought indemnification against the importer. The trial court ruled that the wholesale distributor was not entitled to indemnification from the importer because the jury found both the wholesale distributor and importer liable as joint tortfeasors. The wholesale distributor appealed the lower court’s dismissal of its indemnification claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Townes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership