Golden v. Amory
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
109 N.E.2d 131, 329 Mass. 484 (1952)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The defendants operated a hydroelectric plant and constructed and operated a dike. The plaintiffs owned real estate along the river where the dike was located. A hurricane caused the river to overflow, damaging the plaintiffs’ real estate. The plaintiffs brought suit against the defendants on a theory of strict liability. The trial court directed verdicts to the defendants, holding that strict liability could not be imposed. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lummus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.