Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.
Kansas Court of Appeals
47 Kan. App. 2d 450, 276 P.3d 773 (2012)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Den-Mat Corporation (Den-Mat) (defendant) placed a magazine advertisement for teeth-whitening veneers, which Den-Mat promised would never loosen or discolor. The advertisement drew the attention of Brenda Golden (plaintiff), who contacted Den-Mat to find a local dentist who could apply the veneers. Den-Mat referred Golden to Dr. Carissa Gill (defendant). Gill applied the veneers, which soon discolored and fell off. Golden sued Den-Mat and Gill for breach of express warranties related to the veneers’ quality and for breach of implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. On the undisputed facts of the case, the trial court awarded summary judgment for Den-Mat and Gill. Golden appealed to the Kansas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Atcheson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.