United States Supreme Court
475 U.S. 503 (1986)
S. Simcha Goldman (plaintiff) was an ordained rabbi who was stationed at a military base in California. Goldman was formally reprimanded for wearing a religious yarmulke in violation of a military regulation that prohibited headgear from being worn while indoors on the military base. Goldman brought suit against Weinberger (defendant), the secretary of defense of the United States, arguing that the prohibition of the yarmulke violated Goldman’s right to free exercise of religion under the First Amendment. The district court found in favor of Goldman, and Weinberger appealed. The court of appeals reversed, finding that the appropriate level of scrutiny for a military regulation was a deferential standard. Goldman appealed, arguing that the military regulation should be reviewed under a higher standard. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.