From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Gonzales v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
194 F.3d 29 (1999)
Albert and Mary Gonzales (plaintiffs) were pulled over by Louisiana Deputy Sheriff Darrell Pierce. The Gonzaleses filed a lawsuit in federal court against Pierce, alleging that he violated their rights by pulling them over without probable cause or reasonable suspicion because they were Hispanic. The Gonzaleses alleged that Pierce regularly made traffic stops to extort valuables from travelers, particularly targeting Hispanics and other minorities. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. (NBC) (defendant) broadcast a segment of Dateline NBC discussing abusive law-enforcement practices in Louisiana surrounding unwarranted traffic stops. Dateline employee Pat Weiland drove a car with hidden recording devices and was filmed being stopped by Pierce. Dateline’s report asserted that no traffic laws were broken by Weiland, contrary to Pierce’s claim, and that the video showed Weiland was stopped without probable cause. The Dateline broadcast only included a few short clips of the car moving and Weiland’s stop. The Gonzaleses and Pierce both served subpoenas on NBC for the full footage of Pierce’s traffic stop of Weiland and for deposition testimony of NBC employees. NBC objected, claiming in part that the subpoenaed materials were protected by a qualified privilege. The district court found that while a qualified privilege protected nonconfidential and confidential journalistic information, the Gonzaleses had sufficiently overcome the lesser privilege that protects nonconfidential material. NBC was ordered to produce the subpoenaed material. NBC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.