Gormley v. Robertson

83 P.3d 1042 (2004)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gormley v. Robertson

Washington Court of Appeals
83 P.3d 1042 (2004)

Facts

Lynn Gormley (plaintiff) and Julia Robertson (defendant) were in a romantic relationship and cohabitated for 10 years. During their time together, Gormley and Robertson purchased a house. They used a joint account to pay for the home, and they used joint funds to improve the home. When Gormley and Robertson separated, they disagreed about how to handle the property. Gormley sued Robertson. Gormley argued that the meretricious-relationship doctrine applied to them as a same-sex couple and should be applied when dividing their assets and liabilities. The trial judge agreed with Gormley’s position. The trial court evaluated the nature and extent of the couple’s joint contributions to the property, applied the meretricious-relationship doctrine, and awarded Gormley 30 percent of the home’s equity. Robertson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kato, J.)

Concurrence (Brown, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership