Gossett v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Washington
Washington Supreme Court
133 Wash. 2d 954, 948 P.2d 1264 (1997)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
In 1990, Richard and Margaret Gossett (plaintiffs) made an offer, which was accepted, for an unfinished house. The Gossetts intended to complete the house and then sell it at a profit. In August 1990, the Gossetts spoke to an agent from Farmers Insurance Company of Washington (Farmers) (defendant). Richard represented to the agent that the Gossetts would be the legal owners of the house. On the policy, the Gossetts were the named insured, and Trusty Deed was the mortgagee. The policy covered only “an insurable interest” in the house. Insurable interest is defined by statute as interest in the “preservation of the subject of the insurance free from loss, destruction, or pecuniary damage.” Shortly afterward, the Gossetts assigned their interest in the purchase-and-sale agreement for the house to Trusty Deed. The Gossetts also signed an addendum to the purchase-and-sale agreement, stating that title to the house was to be taken in the name of Trusty Deed. The sale of the house closed on September 5, 1990, and title was placed in Trusty Deed. Trusty Deed was named as the buyer in the closing documents. There is no evidence that Trusty Deed and the Gossetts had an agreement that would permit the Gossetts to purchase the house from Trusty Deed. Although the Gossetts worked on finishing the house, they never resided there. The Gossetts kept some of their possessions in the house, and their sons infrequently stayed there. On November 18, 1990, the house was destroyed in a fire. At that time, the Gossetts had not purchased the house. In the action that followed, the parties disputed whether the Gossetts had an insurable interest in the house.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Madsen J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.