Graber v. City of Ankeny

656 N.W.2d 157 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Graber v. City of Ankeny

Iowa Supreme Court
656 N.W.2d 157 (2003)

Facts

Judith Graber (plaintiff) collided with Kristie Allen at a T-intersection in the City of Ankeny (the city) (defendant). Graber believed that the accident was caused by the city’s improper timing of the traffic light at the intersection. She sued the city for negligence. The city argued that it was immune from liability because setting the timing for traffic lights was a discretionary function involving policy-driven choices by city officials. An Iowa statute rendered local governments immune from tort claims based on discretionary functions. Graber contested the city’s classification of the city’s conduct as a discretionary function. The trial court held in the city’s favor, finding the city immune from liability. Graber appealed to the Iowa Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Streit, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership