Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
116 P.3d 479 (2005)
Grafton Partners L.P. (Grafton) (plaintiff) hired PriceWaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. (PWC) (defendant) to audit certain financial accounts. Grafton and PWC entered into an agreement for these services that included a provision agreeing not to demand a trial by jury for any claims arising out of the agreement. Grafton later sued PWC for negligence and misrepresentation. Grafton alleged that PWC had failed to disclose fraudulent business practices discovered during the audit and, instead, had attempted to cover-up those practices. During the litigation, Grafton demanded a jury trial. PWC moved to strike the jury demand based on the contractual waiver. The trial court granted the motion, and Grafton appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed, and PWC petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (George, C.J.)
Concurrence (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.