North Dakota Supreme Court
770 N.W.2d 692 (2009)
Kevin Schudar, a jailer at the Barnes County Jail, engaged in sexual conduct with Michele Grager while she was a prisoner there. Schudar pled guilty to sexual abuse of a ward under the North Dakota criminal code. Grager (plaintiff) then sued Barnes County and Schudar (defendants) for assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a violation of her civil rights. The district court instructed the jury that if Grager consented to or participated in the sexual conduct it would be a complete defense to her claims. The jury found that Grager consented to Schudar’s conduct, and the district court dismissed Grager’s claims. The district court denied Grager’s motion for a new trial, and Grager appealed, arguing that the district court erred in instructing the jury that consent was a complete defense to her claims.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kapsner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.