Gray v. American Express Co.

743 F.2d 10 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gray v. American Express Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
743 F.2d 10 (1984)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Oscar Gray (plaintiff) had a credit card issued by American Express (defendant). The cardholder agreement between Gray and American Express provided that American Express had the right to cancel Gray’s card at any time and for any reason. In 1981 Gray used his credit card to purchase airline tickets, and American Express agreed to let Gray pay for the tickets in monthly installments over a year. American Express erroneously included the deferred installment payments on Gray’s March 1981 credit card bill as current charges. Gray wrote a letter to American Express on April 22, 1981, explaining the erroneous charges. After American Express failed to investigate the charges, Gray wrote another letter in September. Gray did not pay the disputed amount. In 1982 American Express turned Gray’s account over to a debt-collection agency and canceled his credit card. Gray filed a lawsuit against American Express in federal district court, alleging that American Express had violated the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) by canceling his account while he was disputing the erroneous charges. American Express argued that under the cardholder agreement, it was allowed to cancel Gray’s account at any time and for any reason. The district court granted summary judgment for American Express, holding that Gray failed to fulfill the procedural requirements of the FCBA. The FCBA prohibited a credit card issuer from canceling a card if a consumer failed to pay a disputed bill. To trigger the FCBA’s protections, a consumer had to notify the credit card issuer of the billing dispute within 60 days of receiving his bill. The district court ignored Gray’s April 1981 letter and found that Gray’s September 1981 letter was sent more than 60 days after Gray received his March 1981 bill. Gray appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mikva, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership