Grayned v. City of Rockford
United States Supreme Court
408 U.S. 104 (1972)
- Written by David Schleider, JD
Facts
The City of Rockford had an anti-noise ordinance that prohibited anyone from intentionally making any “noise or diversion” while adjacent to a school in session that “tends to disturb the peace” of the school. Grayned (defendant) was tried and convicted for violating the anti-noise ordinance. Grayned appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court, arguing that the statute is unconstitutional due to its vagueness.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.