Grayson v. Warden

869 F.3d 1204 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Grayson v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
869 F.3d 1204 (2017)

Facts

Four prisoners (the inmates) (plaintiffs) who were sentenced to death brought suit against the Alabama Department of Corrections (department) (defendant). The inmates asserted that the department’s lethal-injection protocol violated the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. At the district court, the inmates were required to show that an alternative method of execution was available to the department. The inmates contended that an alternative drug, pentobarbital, was available to the department. But in one of its previous cases, the district court had determined that pentobarbital was not available to the department. The department thus filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the inmates failed to prove their constitutional claim. In deciding the motion, the district court took judicial notice of its factual finding in its previous case. This meant that the district court accepted as true that pentobarbital was not available to the department. Consequently, the district court granted summary judgment for the department. The inmates appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tjoflat, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership