Great Northern Railway Co. v. Witham
Court of Common Pleas
L.R. 9 C. P. 16 (1873)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Great Northern Railway Co. (plaintiff) published an advertisement seeking an iron distributor. Samuel Witham (defendant) responded, agreeing to supply whatever iron the railway needed for one year. The railway accepted Witham’s offer, and Witham began supplying iron when the railway placed orders from time to time. At some point, the railway placed an order that Witham did not fulfill, and Witham ultimately declined to supply any more iron. The railway sued Witham for breach of contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the railway. Witham appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Keating, J.)
Concurrence (Brett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.