Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. Commissioner

62 T.C. 324 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Greenberg’s Express, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
62 T.C. 324 (1974)

Facts

Thomas Gambino and Joseph Gambino (plaintiffs) were sons of Carlo Gambino, a noted mob boss. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) issued notices of deficiency to both sons based on reinspections of the books of corporations with which the sons were involved. The sons challenged the notices in the United States Tax Court. The sons alleged that the IRS improperly targeted them because the government felt public pressure to appear to take organized crime seriously. The sons further alleged that the deficiencies the IRS determined were arbitrary and unreasonable, failing to adhere to established auditing procedures. The sons filed a motion for a protective order with the tax court seeking several forms of relief on the premise that the IRS unlawfully discriminated against them.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership