Greyhound Corp. v. Both Worlds Inc.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
6 U.S.P.Q.2d 1635 (1988)
Both Worlds Inc. (Worlds) (defendant) applied to register a design mark of a defecating dog on its shirts. Greyhound Corp. (Greyhound) (plaintiff), the owner of a registered trademark of a running dog that was used on clothing, toys, sporting goods, hats, buses, and luggage, filed an opposition to Worlds’s application. Greyhound claimed that Worlds’s mark was very similar to Greyhound’s registered trademark and that both marks would be used for similar goods and services. Greyhound argued that Worlds’s mark contained immoral or scandalous matter, Worlds’ mark would falsely suggest a connection with Greyhound or disparage Greyhound, and Worlds’ use of the mark would cause confusion or deceive consumers. Both parties filed for summary judgment with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.