From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Griffith v. Brymer
King’s Bench Division
19 T.L.R. 434 (1903)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
On June 24, 1902, Murray Griffith (plaintiff) agreed to rent a room from W.E. Brymer (defendant) in order to view the king’s coronation procession, which was scheduled for June 26. Griffith paid Brymer 100 pounds. Approximately one hour prior to the parties’ agreement, unbeknownst to the parties at the time, it was determined that the king would undergo surgery and that the coronation procession would therefore be cancelled. Griffith sued Brymer to recover his payment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
