Griggs v. Miller
Supreme Court of Missouri
374 S.W.2d 119 (1963)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A judgment was recovered against W. A. Brookshire (defendant) in a separate proceeding for approximately $2,000. To pay the judgment, Sheriff Powell levied on Brookshire’s 322 acre farm. Brookshire wrote Powell, stating that the farm could be parceled and that Powell should sell a specific portion of the farm that would only be worth about $4,000. Nonetheless, Powell sold the entire 322 acre farm at a public sale to Bill Griggs (plaintiff) for $20,600. Griggs brought suit against Brookshire seeking to eject him from the farm. Brookshire brought a counterclaim against Griggs and Powell, seeking to set aside the sale. The court found against Brookshire on all claims. Miller, on behalf of Brookshire, appealed, arguing that it was improper for the entire farm to be sold without an attempt to pay the judgment against Brookshire by selling a portion of the farm.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bohling, Special Commissioner)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.