Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 156, 89 S.Ct. 331 (1968)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Grunenthal (plaintiff) was injured while working for Long Island Rail Road (Long Island) (defendant). Grunenthal sued Long Island under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the complaint, Grunenthal requested damages in the amount of $250,000. The jury returned a verdict in Grunenthal’s favor and awarded damages of $305,000. Grunenthal was given leave to amend the damage request in the complaint. Long Island moved the court to set aside the damage award on the ground that it was excessive. The judge denied the motion, and Long Island appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court of appeals directed the lower court to enter a remittitur, giving Grunenthal the option to accept a $105,000 reduction of the damage award or have the judge order a new trial. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.