Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. North River Insurance Co.

909 F.2d 133 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. North River Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
909 F.2d 133 (1990)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

The day after being admitted to Texarkana Memorial Hospital for psychiatric care, Margaret Wagner died after jumping out of her fourth-floor window. Due to lack of space, Wagner was placed in a less-secure open unit, as opposed to a closed unit, which had protective window screens. After a previous open-unit patient escaped through a window, the hospital installed screws limiting the window to open a few inches. Wagner’s estate sued the hospital. A jury found three negligent acts, each a proximate cause of Wagner’s death: failure to (1) monitor Wagner; (2) maintain the windows to prevent escape or suicide; and (3) provide sufficient trained staff. The jury awarded $968,985.82 in damages. The hospital had four insurance policies: (1) $500,000 in comprehensive general liability coverage from North River Insurance Company (North River) (defendant); (2) $200,000 per claim, $600,000 in aggregate professional liability coverage from United States Fire Insurance Company (US Fire) (defendant); (3) excess liability coverage from Guaranty National Insurance Company (Guaranty) (plaintiff) providing $500,000 above the general liability coverage and $500,000 per claim, $1,000,000 in aggregate above the professional liability coverage; and (4) excess liability insurance from Ranger Insurance Company (Ranger) (plaintiff) for $25,000,000 in excess of all the other insurance. US Fire paid $200,000, its claim limit. North River paid nothing, citing the policy’s exclusion for the rendering of any service or treatment conducive to health or of a professional nature. Guaranty and Ranger paid the remainder of the judgment and filed suit against North River, citing nonpayment, and US Fire, arguing $600,000 was the appropriate limit. Following four motions for summary judgment, the district court found that US Fire was liable for $200,000 and that North River was liable under its policy. North River appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

Dissent (Gee, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership