Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. North River Insurance Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
909 F.2d 133 (1990)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
The day after being admitted to Texarkana Memorial Hospital for psychiatric care, Margaret Wagner died after jumping out of her fourth-floor window. Due to lack of space, Wagner was placed in a less-secure open unit, as opposed to a closed unit, which had protective window screens. After a previous open-unit patient escaped through a window, the hospital installed screws limiting the window to open a few inches. Wagner’s estate sued the hospital. A jury found three negligent acts, each a proximate cause of Wagner’s death: failure to (1) monitor Wagner; (2) maintain the windows to prevent escape or suicide; and (3) provide sufficient trained staff. The jury awarded $968,985.82 in damages. The hospital had four insurance policies: (1) $500,000 in comprehensive general liability coverage from North River Insurance Company (North River) (defendant); (2) $200,000 per claim, $600,000 in aggregate professional liability coverage from United States Fire Insurance Company (US Fire) (defendant); (3) excess liability coverage from Guaranty National Insurance Company (Guaranty) (plaintiff) providing $500,000 above the general liability coverage and $500,000 per claim, $1,000,000 in aggregate above the professional liability coverage; and (4) excess liability insurance from Ranger Insurance Company (Ranger) (plaintiff) for $25,000,000 in excess of all the other insurance. US Fire paid $200,000, its claim limit. North River paid nothing, citing the policy’s exclusion for the rendering of any service or treatment conducive to health or of a professional nature. Guaranty and Ranger paid the remainder of the judgment and filed suit against North River, citing nonpayment, and US Fire, arguing $600,000 was the appropriate limit. Following four motions for summary judgment, the district court found that US Fire was liable for $200,000 and that North River was liable under its policy. North River appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
Dissent (Gee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.