Guenther v. Pacific Telecom, Inc.

123 F.R.D. 341 (1988)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Guenther v. Pacific Telecom, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Oregon
123 F.R.D. 341 (1988)

Facts

Several minority shareholders (plaintiffs) of American Network, Inc. (AmNet) (defendant) sued AmNet and its directors, as well as Pacific Telecom, Inc. and its directors, and Price Waterhouse & Co., Inc. and its accountant (defendants) (collectively, the corporations and directors) and asserted direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty. Thereafter, the minority shareholders in question agreed to exchange all of their AmNet shares for the right to receive a payment. Consequently, the corporations and directors moved to dismiss the claims for breach of fiduciary duty on the ground that the now former minority shareholders were no longer shareholders of AmNet.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marsh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership