Halbman v. Lemke
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
298 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1980)
James Halbman (plaintiff), a minor, entered into a contract to buy a car from Michael Lemke (defendant). The car was to be paid for in installments and after Halbman had paid $1,100 on the $1,250 purchase price, a connecting rod on the car’s engine broke. Halbman repaired it at a cost of over $600. He then sent a letter to Lemke disaffirming the contract and asking for his money back. Lemke refused. Between the time the car was repaired and the contract was disaffirmed, vandalism made the car unsalvageable. Halbman brought suit for the $1,100 he had paid on the car, and Lemke counterclaimed for the $150 left on the purchase price. The trial court ruled in favor of Halbman and the appellate court affirmed. Lemke appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Callow, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.