Halona v. MacDonald
Navajo Nation Supreme Court
1 Nav. R. 189 (1978)
The Navajo Tribal Council made interim budget changes to appropriate money for the legal expenses of Navajo Nation Chairman Peter MacDonald (defendant) under council resolution CAP-32-77. However, by making these changes, the council violated earlier council resolution CF-18-77, which required that all budgetary measures be approved by the budget and finance committee. Eldon Hansen (plaintiff) sued to enjoin the interim budget appropriations, arguing that resolution CAP-32-77, passed after CF-18-77, was invalid. The District Court of Shiprock in the Navajo Nation enjoined MacDonald from spending the appropriated funds. MacDonald appealed to the Navajo Nation Supreme Court, arguing that the Navajo courts lacked jurisdiction to review Navajo tribal council decisions.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bluehouse, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.