Hanson v. Central Show Printing Co., Inc.

130 N.W.2d 654 (1964)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...

Hanson v. Central Show Printing Co., Inc.

Iowa Supreme Court

130 N.W.2d 654 (1964)

Facts

Harry Hanson (plaintiff) worked for Central Show Printing Company, Incorporated (Central Show) (defendant) as a pressman for many years. In autumn of 1959, Hanson had the opportunity to take a new job with another nearby printing company. Hanson simply desired steady work, so he contacted the president of Central Show to negotiate an arrangement for steady work so he could stay with the company. Ultimately, the president sent Hanson a letter guaranteeing Hanson 40 hours of work per week each year until he “retired of his own choosing.” Hanson declined the opportunity for the new job and remained with Central Show. Two years later, Hanson was discharged without cause by Central Show. Hanson brought an action against Central Show to recover lost wages. Central Show made a motion for directed verdict at the close of evidence, which the trial court granted. Hanson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership