Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
921 F.3d 1343 (2019)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Beginning in 1995, a cosmetics-sales company called Hard Candy, LLC (plaintiff) owned a federally registered trademark for the mark “HARD CANDY.” Hard Candy licensed the mark to a producer of cosmetics sold exclusively by Wal-Mart under the Hard Candy name. In 2015, a cosmetics company called Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc. (Anastasia) (defendant) released a flip-open product called the Gleam Glow Kit (the kit). The kit contained different shades of facial highlighter. One of the highlighter shades was a peachy pink color called “HARD CANDY,” as listed inside and on the back of the kit package. Anastasia chose the name because the shimmer of the shade reminded the kit developer of candies from her youth. Hard Candy sent Anastasia a cease-and-desist letter, claiming trademark infringement. The companies were unable to resolve the matter, and Anastasia sold the kit as a limited edition with the “HARD CANDY” highlighter shade. Hard Candy brought suit in the district court, claiming trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act. After a bench trial, the district court determined that Hard Candy’s trademark was strong but that Anastasia was not using the term “HARD CANDY” as a mark. Instead, Anastasia fairly used the term as a description for the sheen of the makeup shade labeled. Because Hard Candy offered no evidence of actual confusion among cosmetic consumers, the district court found that there was no likelihood of consumer confusion, which was necessary to support a trademark-infringement claim against Anastasia. Hard Candy appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.