Harrison v. M.S. Carriers, Inc.

1999 WL 195539 (1999)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
H
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Harrison v. M.S. Carriers, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
1999 WL 195539 (1999)

DM

Facts

Dave Harrison, Jr., Mary Gilbert, and Cynthia Daniels (plaintiffs) were in a vehicle collision with a tractor. Harrison was driving the vehicle in which Gilbert and Daniels rode. The plaintiffs sued M.S. Carriers, Inc., which owned the tractor, and others (defendants) in a Louisiana state court, for injuries allegedly sustained in the accident. The defendants removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity. Gilbert and Daniels then sought to amend their complaint to state negligence claims against Harrison as a defendant, as well as his insurance company. Harrison did not have diverse citizenship from Gilbert and Daniels. A magistrate judge denied the motion to amend without prejudice, asserting that Gilbert and Daniels could bring a cross-claim against Harrison and an amended complaint against his insurer. Gilbert and Daniels sought review of the magistrate’s order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sear, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms