Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Hart v. Massanari

266 F.3d 1155 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Hart v. Massanari

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

266 F.3d 1155 (2001)

Facts

In his opening brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the attorney for Patricia Hart (plaintiff) cited an unpublished Ninth Circuit opinion, Rice v. Chater, No. 95-35604, 1996 WL 583605 (1996). Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provided that unpublished opinions were not binding precedent and could not be cited by parties in cases before the Ninth Circuit or other courts within the circuit. The Ninth Circuit ordered Hart’s attorney to show cause and explain why he should not be sanctioned for violating Rule 36-3. In his response, Hart’s attorney cited Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (2000), in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that all appellate court decisions should have precedential value and that court rules that provided otherwise were unconstitutional.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership