Harvest Rice, Inc. v. Fritz and Mertice Lehman Elevator and Dryer, Inc.
Arkansas Supreme Court
365 Ark. 573, 231 S.W.3d 720 (2006)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Harvest Rice, Inc. (plaintiff) discussed purchasing 67,500 hundredweights of rough rice from Fritz and Mertice Lehman Elevator and Dryer, Inc. doing business as Lehman Elevator (Lehman) (defendant). On April 1, 2003, Harvest Rice faxed a buyer report to Lehman, which contained the quantity, price, date of delivery, and other terms. Lehman reportedly did not receive the report until several days later, and Lehman faxed a letter to Harvest Rice on April 15, 2003, objecting to the terms of the report. Lehman’s letter also stated that Lehman would be unable to make the sale. Harvest Rice then sued Lehman, alleging breach of contract. Lehman moved for summary judgment, arguing that the alleged oral contract violated the statute of frauds and that no oral agreement had been reached. The trial court granted the motion, and Harvest Rice appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gunter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.