Haumschild v. Continental Cas. Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
7 Wis.2d 130, 95 M.W.2d 814 (1959)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Mr. Haumschild (defendant) and Mrs. Haumschild (plaintiff), domiciliaries of Wisconsin, were in a car accident in California. After the couple divorced, Mrs. Haumschild filed a lawsuit against her former husband and his automobile insurer, Continental Cas. Co. (defendant), in a Wisconsin court, for injuries she received in the accident. Applying California law, the court dismissed her suit on the grounds that California prohibited interspousal tort actions. Wisconsin law, on the other hand, permitted suits between spouses. Mrs. Haumschild appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Currie, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.