Hawaiian Isle Adventures, Inc. v. North American Capacity Insurance Co.

623 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (2009)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hawaiian Isle Adventures, Inc. v. North American Capacity Insurance Co.

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
623 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (2009)

Facts

Hawaiian Isle Adventures, Inc. (HIA) (plaintiff) offered ecological tours that included activities like hiking, snorkeling, boogie boarding, surfing, and lectures on Hawaiian culture. After a customer broke his pelvis during a hike, HIA decided to acquire general-liability insurance to protect itself from liability for future incidents. It obtained such a policy from North American Capacity Insurance Co. (NAC) (defendant). The policy stated that NAC would pay all damages HIA became obligated to pay because of covered bodily injuries or property damage and that NAC would defend HIA in any suits to recover such damages. Conversely, it expressly stated that NAC had no duty to defend or indemnify HIA for bodily injuries or property damage that were not covered, for example because they fell under an exclusion. The policy’s designated-work exclusion stated that the policy did not cover bodily injuries arising from “your work,” which it described as waterfall hiking, snorkeling, boogie boarding, and surfing. An athletic exclusion stated that the policy did not cover any bodily injuries incurred by a person “while practicing for or participating in any sports or athletic contest or exhibition” sponsored by HIA. During the policy period, Lee Townes drowned while snorkeling on an HIA tour. Townes’s wife filed a wrongful-death action against HIA to recover damages. NAC refused to defend HIA in the suit or indemnify it for any damages, arguing that Townes’s death fell under the designated-work and athletic exclusions. HIA sued NAC in federal court, seeking a declaratory judgment that Townes’s death was a covered injury and a holding that NAC had breached the policy contract by refusing coverage. NAC moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mollway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 918,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership