Haywood v. AmBase Corp.

2005 WL 2130614 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Haywood v. AmBase Corp.

Delaware Court of Chancery
2005 WL 2130614 (2005)

Facts

George Haywood and Denis Cronin (plaintiffs) were common shareholders in AmBase Corporation (AmBase) (defendant). AmBase’s chief executive officer, president, and chairman was Richard Bianco. AmBase had owned and operated a savings and loan company until the United States government put this company into receivership, after which AmBase’s primary business became suing the United States government for damages related to that action. Bianco’s compensation from AmBase comprised a salary, bonuses, stock options, and a pension. Bianco’s total annual compensation was approximately 10 percent of AmBase’s value as measured by its market capitalization. Haywood and Cronin, believing Bianco’s compensation to be excessive, made written demands to AmBase to inspect its books to investigate possible wrongdoing in relation to Bianco’s compensation. AmBase refused, and Haywood and Cronin sued, alleging that they were entitled to inspect the documents pursuant to § 220 of the Delaware General Corporate Law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parsons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership