Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins
United States Supreme Court
507 U.S. 604 (1993)
Biggins (plaintiff) worked for Hazen Paper Co. (Hazen) (defendant) as the company's technical director for nearly a decade. In 1986, he was fired at the age of 62, weeks before his employee pension benefits plan would have vested. Biggins sued Hazen, alleging he was wrongfully terminated on the basis of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §623(a)(1), and to prevent his pension from vesting in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §1140. Hazen claimed Biggins was fired for conducting business with its competitors. Biggins succeeded in federal district court on both his ADEA and ERISA claims, and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed. Hazen sought review by the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.