Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH

Case No. C-49/02 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH

European Union Court of Justice
Case No. C-49/02 (2004)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH (Heidelberger) applied to the German Patent Office (the patent office) for registration of the colors blue and yellow as a trademark. The application showed the mark as a rectangle, with the upper half blue and the lower half yellow. The mark description stated that the colors were used in every conceivable form and specified the colors as RAL 5015/HKS 47—blue, RAL 1016/HKS 3—yellow. The application was for use of the mark in relation to various hardware products, such as adhesives, solvents, paints, and insulating materials. The patent office refused to register Heidelberger’s mark. Heidelberger appealed to the national court. The national court stayed proceedings and referred the case to the European Union Court of Justice, requesting a preliminary ruling on questions regarding interpretation of Article 2 of the First Council Directive (the directive) and the registration of colors or combinations of colors as a trademark.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership