Heideman v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
259 F.2d 943 (1958)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Paul Heideman (defendant) and a friend had been drinking. Both entered a taxicab and Heideman, using a sock filled with gravel, struck the taxi driver, thereby rendering him helpless, and proceeded to rob the taxi driver of his wallet. Heideman requested that the trial court provide a drunkenness instruction in order to allow the trier of fact to consider whether he was so intoxicated on the night in question as to be incapable of forming the intent to rob. The trial court denied his request, and Heideman was convicted of robbery. Heideman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.