Henderson v. Quest Expeditions
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
174 S.W.3d 730 (2005)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Nathan Henderson (plaintiff) was injured during a white-water rafting trip operated by Quest Expeditions, Inc. (Quest) (defendant). After completing the trip, Henderson and other rafters were put on two different buses so that they could be taken back to their vehicles. While disembarking from the first bus, Henderson slipped and fell, sustaining severe injuries. Henderson and his wife (plaintiff) filed a negligence suit against Quest, seeking damages. In its answer to the complaint, Quest conceded that Henderson had participated in the rafting trip, but argued that Quest was immune from liability due to a Waiver and Release of Liability form that Henderson had signed prior to the trip. The Hendersons claimed that the waiver document was void as against the public policy of the state. The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment in favor of Quest. The Hendersons appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Franks, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.