Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Hendricks v. Behee

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District
786 S.W.2d 610 (1990)



On March 2, 1987, Behee (defendant) offered to purchase real estate from Artice and Pearl Smith (defendants). Behee submitted the offer to the Smiths’ real estate agent. The agent mailed the written offer to the Smiths on March 3rd. On March 4th, the Smiths signed and accepted the offer. This acceptance was not communicated to Behee at this time. Before the Smiths communicated their acceptance to Behee, Behee contacted the Smiths’ real estate agent and withdrew the offer. This prompted a dispute between Behee and the Smiths over whether a binding contract existed. Hendricks (plaintiff) was the escrowee of $5,000 which was paid by Behee when he made his original offer to the Smiths. After the dispute between Behee and the Smiths, Hendricks filed an interpleader action against Behee and the Smiths in Missouri state court. Behee filed a cross-claim against the Smiths. The trial court awarded Hendricks $997.50 to be paid out of Behee’s $5,000 deposit. The trial court awarded the remaining $4,002.50 to Behee. The Smiths appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Flanigan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 448,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 448,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

What is the public policy significance of this case?

In other words, what does this prevent from happening or ensure that happens in terms of contract law? What is the bigger real life application to this holding?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod.